Georgia (the ex-Soviet Republic, not the U.S. state) is now a remarkable success story.
Its economy is growing at 5% per year, and the country ranks ahead of the United States in economic freedom.
Yet, 20 years ago, Georgia was even more miserably poor than the rest of the former Soviet Union.
So, what can America and the rest of the world learn from Georgia’s progress?
A lot, says my executive producer Maxim Lott. He’s spent the past several months in Georgia and made a StosselTV video about it.
All former Soviet states are poor because the communists had grabbed everyone’s private property and put it under government control.
They thought they were smart enough to run the economy. They did things like order Georgians to produce tea. Soon, 95% of tea in the Soviet Union came from Georgia.
But Georgia is not the best place to grow tea.
After the Soviet Union collapsed, “People started to taste Indian tea and realized that tea is actually better,” says Georgian politician Zurab Japaridze. “Nobody wanted Georgian tea.”
That industry, and most others, vanished when Soviet support ended. “Three-fourths of the Georgian economy disappeared,” he says.
Central planners are never smart enough to run something as complex as an economy.
Fortunately, in Georgia, an eccentric libertarian, Kakha Bendukidze, became economy minister in 2004. He made “everything private, as much as possible.”
Georgia scrapped 90% of licensing and permit requirements. That reduced corruption.
“Every license means interaction with officials. Every interaction with the official can be an open door for a corrupt request,” explains Fady Asly, chairman of Georgia’s International Chamber of Commerce.
Before those reforms, “Corruption was so rampant!” says Asly. “A high-ranking official told me: ‘I have a friend who’s very honest. We would like him to chair of the anti-corruption commission, but he has to pay someone $10,000 to get this job.’ The future chair of the anti-corruption commission had to bribe someone to get the job!”
Georgia has come a long way since then. With fewer rules to obey and licenses to get, there are fewer reasons to bribe. Transparency International now says Georgia is less corrupt than all its neighbors. The country also fired its entire police force, customs office and tax service, and diminished government agencies by half.
This created a “huge boom,” says Asly. “Georgia turned from a failed state to a very successful state.” Its economy grew 10% a year.
Buildings that had been burned were restored. McDonald’s and KFC arrived. Some prosperity came to Georgia.
“This was kind of a libertarian utopia for four years,” says Iva Nachkebia, national coordinator for Georgia’s branch of Students for Liberty.
But then the politicians decided that since things were going well, they would get in on the action. Instead of leaving markets free, they gave privileges to cronies.
“They chose 10, 15, 20 businessmen who were close to the government,” says Asly. “And they started protecting them at the expense of their competitors.”
Since the protected businesses got big tax breaks, businessmen like Asly couldn’t compete.
“After losing a couple of million dollars,” says Asly, “I decided to stop the business.”
Economic growth slowed. Now the economy grows at half the rate it once grew.
Japaridze thinks Georgia re-embraced big government because “people did not actually understand” why Georgia’s economy improved. Years of Soviet propaganda kept people from learning about markets.
He says that mentality must change for Georgia to develop. Either “you want to take responsibility about your life, or you are fine with being a slave and having some kind of a master who will provide you with your needs.”
He’s right, but I question whether “years of Soviet rule” are what made the difference. There’s plenty of hostility toward free markets among privileged Americans who’ve never heard Soviet propaganda.
The overall lesson from Georgia, says Asly: “Government should be very small. It should just regulate the minimum.”
2 thoughts on “Lessons from Georgia”
But today it is the younger generation that wants to turn to more government control.
A new cradle to grave care with them makeing fewer and fewer personal decisions.
look at all the people who are happy to sit at home collecting the monthly cheques
Comments are closed.